<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Luise Pusch&apos;s weblog</title>
    <link>http://www.fembio.org/english/biography.php/woman/blog</link>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>luise.f.pusch@gmail.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-05-10T15:27:00+01:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Hillary and the Wise Women of New Hampshire</title>
      <link>http://www.fembio.org/english/biography.php/woman/blog/hillary&#45;und&#45;die&#45;weisen&#45;frauen&#45;von&#45;new&#45;hampshire/</link>
      <dc:subject>Laut &amp; Luise, feminist commentary</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[ A little less than a year ago I wrote my first column on Hillary and Barack and the false alternatives “Change” (Barack) vs. “Experience” (Hillary). Hillary most definitely represents both; I am less certain about Obama. Obama is celebrated—especially among whites—as one whose own family background, as well as his views, can transcend the racial divide: his mother is a Caucasian American, his father an African from Kenya. But how is Hillary supposed to transcend the gender-divide? She does try, insofar as she mentions it as little as possible, thereby disappointing many women. But in no way can she “personify” &#8230; ]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-01-12T22:22:01+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>